The kind of agent the work needs
From one agent running a defined process to a team of agents that check each other, a copilot for staff or a voice agent on the phone.
Discuss it with us[00] AI Agent Development
We build AI agents that do work, not just answer questions. An agent reads a request, plans the steps, uses your CRM, ERP or email to carry them out, and completes the task or hands it to a person for approval, with every step logged.
built for
Illustration of a workflow editor running 3 example workflows. 1: An invoice email arrives. The agent reads the invoice, checks it against the purchase order in the ERP, finds that the total does not match, explains the mismatch with its sources and waits for finance to decide instead of posting it. 2: A new lead arrives from the website. The agent checks the CRM and researches the company, scores it against your criteria, saves the score and notes in the CRM, assigns an owner and drafts a first email for the sales rep to send. 3: An employee asks for help in Teams. The agent works out that it is a VPN access request, checks the IT policy, resets access through a narrowly scoped API, replies to the employee and closes the ticket with its trace saved.
What we deliver
Good first agents handle document-heavy, rule-guided work: qualifying leads, processing invoices and contracts, triaging tickets, preparing reports or answering IT and HR requests. We work with GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama and Mistral, frameworks such as LangGraph, CrewAI and Microsoft Agent Framework, and connect tools through APIs or the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
Agents are capable, and they can also be wrong with confidence. So we start narrow, give each agent only the permissions its job needs, keep people in the loop for anything costly or irreversible, and measure it on real cases before it runs on its own.
From one agent running a defined process to a team of agents that check each other, a copilot for staff or a voice agent on the phone.
Discuss it with usAgents that run a defined process end to end, such as reading an invoice, matching it to a purchase order and posting it, with exceptions sent to a person.
Several specialised agents, for example a researcher, a writer and a reviewer, coordinated so each one checks the others' work.
Agents inside Slack, Teams or your own app that prepare drafts, research and recommendations for an employee to review and act on.
Phone and voice agents that understand a caller, look up their records and complete simple tasks such as booking or rescheduling.
Agents act through your systems' APIs or MCP servers, look up your documents and remember past cases, each with access scoped to its job.
Discuss it with usConnections to your CRM, ERP, helpdesk, databases, email and calendars through APIs or MCP servers, each with its own scoped credentials.
Agents look up your policies, contracts and records through retrieval from a vector database, and cite the source behind each decision.
Short-term memory for the task in hand and long-term memory of past cases and preferences, stored in systems you control.
Approval steps for anything costly or irreversible, and a trace of every step so you can see what the agent did and measure how well.
Discuss it with usApproval gates for payments, customer emails, record changes or anything else you choose, so the agent proposes and a person confirms.
Test suites built from real cases, a trace of every model call and tool use, and dashboards for success rate, cost and time per task.
which approach fits
Agents earn their cost where inputs are messy and the next step takes judgement. Where the steps never change, a bot or a plain integration is cheaper and more predictable, and we will say so.
Answering questions from customers or staff
inputs: Your help content, policies and FAQs
the right fit: A chatbot that answers from your content, with agent actions added later
AI chatbot developmentOne multi-step process with emails or documents in the middle
inputs: Free-form emails, PDFs and forms, plus your systems' APIs
the right fit: A workflow agent with approval steps for anything costly
Research, drafting and review that one pass gets wrong
inputs: Several sources that need checking against each other
the right fit: A multi-agent system, where one agent checks another's work
Helping employees prepare work they then sign off
inputs: The tools your team already uses, such as Slack, Teams or your own app
the right fit: A copilot that drafts and recommends, with the employee deciding
Stable steps on structured screens or data
inputs: Fixed fields in systems that rarely change
the right fit: An RPA bot, or a bot with an agent for the few steps that need judgement
AI agents vs RPAMoving the same data between two systems
inputs: Two systems with APIs
the right fit: A plain integration. No agent needed, and we will tell you so.
grounded decisions
When the agent runs Docs.read, it reads the invoice itself and ties every word of its decision to the part of the page it came from. A person checks that trace and approves, or sends it back, before anything is paid.
Supplier, date, PO number, line items and total are marked before the agent decides.
Each word of the decision is linked to the region it relied on.
The run holds at the approval step until someone has checked the trace.
Illustration: a model reads an invoice image, marks the vendor, date, PO number, line items and total, then answers the question “Docs.read(invoice) → approve?” word by word (“Hold: PO number and total do not match the order.”), with lines showing which part of the image each word relied on.
Why it matters
AI Agent Development is planned around these outcomes, measured against a baseline we agree with you up front.
Discuss your projectAgents take on the copy, check and update steps that sit between your tools and usually fall to a person.
Approval steps and narrow permissions keep staff in charge of payments, customer messages and anything that cannot be undone.
A full trace shows the inputs, the steps taken, the tools called and the results, which makes audits and debugging straightforward.
A model-agnostic design lets you move to a better or cheaper model later without rebuilding the agent.
How we work
A clear four-step process, so you always know what happens next and what you will get.
Every project starts with a free, no-obligation consultation.
$ appsinai run --pilot-first
We map one workflow, its systems and its exceptions, and agree what the agent may do on its own and what needs approval.
you get workflow map · approval rules · success measure · fixed quote
we need a walkthrough of the workflow · past cases with known outcomes · one decision-maker
Tools, permissions, memory, model choice and approval steps are written down before any code. We then build the agent and its integrations and test it on past cases where the correct outcome is known.
you get agent design · working agent · test results · cost per task
we need test access to your systems · sign-off on the design
The agent works alongside your team, proposing actions that people approve or correct, so its accuracy is measured safely before it acts on its own.
you get measured accuracy · go / no-go
we need reviewers who approve or correct its proposals
As accuracy holds, approvals are relaxed where you agree, more tasks are added, and traces and costs are monitored.
you get trace dashboard · cost tracking · new tasks
we need agreement on which approvals to relax
↺ results feed the next improvement cycle$
Security & control
An agent that can act needs tighter controls than one that only talks. These controls are built in from the first version, not added later.
Ask us about securityEach agent has its own credentials with only the permissions its task needs, read-only wherever possible, and spending or rate limits where relevant.
Content the agent reads, such as emails, documents and web pages, is treated as data. Instructions hidden in it cannot trigger actions outside the agent's allowed tools.
Every model call, tool use, approval and result is recorded with the time and the user, and kept for the period you set.
Agents can run in your own cloud account, as a hybrid set-up, or on-premises with open models when data cannot leave your network.
FAQ
Straight answers to what buyers ask us most. Can't find what you need?
Email sales@appsin.ai or call +91-9025555584.
Ask us directlyA chatbot mainly answers questions in a conversation. An agent plans the steps of a task, uses tools such as your CRM, ERP or email to carry them out, and checks the result. Many projects start with a chatbot and add agent abilities, such as booking or refunds, once the basics work.
See AI chatbot developmentRPA follows fixed rules on structured screens and data, and breaks when a layout or input changes. Agents handle unstructured inputs such as emails and documents and decide the next step. Many workflows use both: RPA for stable, repetitive clicks and an agent for the steps that need judgement.
AI agents vs RPAIt depends on the task, your budget, your security rules and how fast it must respond. We test candidate models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and open families such as Llama and Mistral on your own cases, and often use a stronger model for planning and a cheaper one for routine steps.
A focused agent for one workflow typically takes 4 to 8 weeks, including testing on real cases. Enterprise or multi-agent systems with several integrations usually take 8 to 16 weeks or more, depending on how many systems are involved and how ready the data is.
Build cost depends on the number of steps and systems, the integrations, the approval and audit requirements and the hosting model. Running cost depends on the model and the number of tasks, and we estimate cost per task during testing so you can compare it with the time it saves.
Work out your automation ROIYes. With open models such as Llama or Mistral, agents can run in a private cloud or on-premises, so data never leaves your network. Hardware needs depend on the model size and the number of tasks, and we size it with you.
Before it acts alone, it runs in shadow mode, where people approve or correct every action it proposes. After that, spending and rate limits cap the damage a wrong step can do, input checks catch malformed requests, and the trace of every step is reviewed, so mistakes are caught early and can be explained.
It stops and hands the case to a person, with what it found so far and why it stopped. Low confidence, an input it has not seen before, a tool error or a request outside its allowed actions all lead to a handover rather than a guess. Handovers are counted on the dashboard, so you can see where the agent needs to improve.
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard for connecting AI agents and assistants to tools and data. A system exposed once as an MCP server can be used by any compatible agent or assistant. It is worth it when several agents, or tools such as Claude or ChatGPT, need the same systems. For a single agent, a direct API integration works just as well.
MCP in our AI glossaryAny system with an API, such as your CRM, ERP, helpdesk, accounting software, databases, email and calendars, and channels such as Slack, Teams, WhatsApp or your own app. Where a system has no API, an RPA bot can work through its screens for the agent.
Models and tools we useFree PDF brochure
Features, outcomes, delivery process and FAQs in one PDF you can share with your team or management.
Your download should start automatically. If not, use the button.
related
Free consultation
Tell us about a workflow your team repeats every day and we will show you how an agent would handle it, where people stay in the loop and how we would measure it.